Jamaat-e-Islami’s True Colors

Well, I have been wondering that why Jamaat-e-Islami is so fond of Talibani Government System. Manuwar Hassan who is Amir of JI has recently given an interview on a private TV Channel and exposed his own dirty face after telling the public his diabolical views about Rape Victims. I am astonished that how can people trust such barbaric monsters who have been propagating lesser rights for women and trying to slay rape victims rather to provide them swift justice.

 Well, it was no surprise. It came to pass on a talk show where Manuwar Hassan told his dirty views about the Rape Victims. Well, this mindset is usual 1 = 2 mindset that believes that 1 man is equal to 2 women. So Manuwar Hassan didn’t say anything new. He has just exposed his dirty Talibani mind. Well, the logic that he used was very circular in nature having nothing new in that.

He argued that if a woman is raped and she doesn’t produce 4 male eye-witnesses of rape then either she should keep quiet or she should be prosecuted under the Shariah Law. He didn’t say what punishment she should be awarded. I assume that he was talking about stoning her to death just like what Zia ul Haq did when a poor blind rape victim failed to produce eye-witnesses of rape.

We are going to see what is wrong with this logic and how this logic very vague as it is not applicable on other scenarios. Mr. Manuwar Hassan discredited Biology and biological evidences of rape and stated that Islamic compulsion is to bring four male eye-witnesses of rape and there is no credibility of biological evidence. Well, this logic is very stupid in itself. Let’s see how.

First of all we need to know what is the punishment of the people who accuse women of adultery and fail to bring four eye-witnesses. Quran clearly states in Surah Noor that they should be given 80 lashes in public and their shadah will not be accepted forever. Whereas Hudood Ordinance promulgated by Zia was a shameful act to appease Islamist zealots and extremists (such as JI and present day Taliban) to carry on the mission of CIA to oust Soviet Union from Afghanistan. It was no other than Jamaat-e-Islami that tinted the Islamic principles and values of tolerance and took Dollars from CIA. Fareed Paracha, Munawar Hassan, Hafiz Hussain, Qazi Hussain and so many other people were on the payroll of CIA during Soviet Jihad days. Hudood Ordinance by Zia was based on political gains and to silence the growing moderate middle class of this country. We see that Zia lashed many people under the pretext of morality and JI always supported it.

Well, what’s new? Jamaat-e-Islami always supports every barbaric act that is carried under the name of Islam. Let it be suicide bombings by Taliban or beheading of spys by them. JI always supports every act of extremism that she nurtured during 80s and 90s with the help of American money. So JI’s new slogan amreeka ka aik ilaaj aljihad aljihad is nothing new. Same Al-Jihad was nurtured by JI and CIA during 80s and it blossomed in the orchard of Zia and now it is a poison spreading all over the world. So it should be of no surprise to readers that JI supports that women rape victims should keep quiet or they should be stoned to death (unlike those men who accuse women of adultery).  Well, let’s see how this logic is illogical and cannot be taken as a valid excuse to deny justice to the women when they are rapped and fail to produce four male-witnesses.

(1) If Quran discredit biological evidence that includes DNA Test then this means that if two people do sex willingly and there are no eye-witnesses of that then they cannot be prosecuted as well. If someone accuses them of adultery then he should keep quiet or must be stoned to death or given 80 lashes in public.

Well, Jamaat-e-Islami is opposed to that. In this case (you can ask any Jamaatiya) and he would say that it is fahashi (obscenity) and fahashi (obscenity) must be culled by force. Then if you dare to ask what happens to 4 eye-witness logic here, he would either pronounce you Kafir or would call you Westernised and Modern (mind you it is no lauding. It is an abuse in their eyes lol) .

(2) JI Supporters would  say that if Rape happens behind closed doors and their are no eye-witnesses (4 male witnesses, mind you) then woman cannot prosecute the rapist because there are no eye-witnesses and it happened in one’s house and privacy of one’s house is protected.

Well, how stupid? If someone is having dance party at home or he drinks alcohol at home then JI would not only push authorities to take action but will also incite a mob and will rampage the property. I would ask where does the logic of Privacy of House go in this case? Please don’t dare to ask because angry mob can rampage you and your family too.

 Both of the logics that JI produced are vague and stupid in themselves. Jamaat-e-Islami has track record of supporting every barbaric act against women, minorities and moderate people. I have not heard any Jamaat-e-Islami stalwart denouncing Child Brides. I have not heard any Jamatiya denouncing the Fatwa of Taliban that it is lawful to make sex-slaves of women of people who are against Taliban. I have not heard any Jamatiya denouncing suicide bombings (I heard them  supporting them publicly)…

The list is so long that it cannot be written in one single post. However, Jamaat-e-Islami, Islami Jamiat-e-Tulba and other Taliban supports do support denied justice to rape victims. Well, they also support 9 years old child brides or when a Wali gives in Nikkah any minor girl to 75 years old haggard! When minor girls are given in marriage to settle disputes, Jamaat-e-Islami doesn’t take out any Go Rapist Go Rally. I haven’t heard of any rally of Jamaat-e-Islami on these genuine humanitarian issues. 

Jamaat-e-Islami is nothing but public face of Taliban and Islamic extremism and they should be banned like Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan not only in Pakistan but all over the world. The hypocrisy of Jamaat-e-Islami can be seen and is evident. Some facts are written below.

(1) JI says Go Amereeka Go and many JI leader’s children are settled in Amreeka itself along with Canada, Europe and Australia. Qazi Hussain’s son’s adventurous life in Paris is no secret.

(2) JI though is very much hyper on the issue of obscenity but close interaction with many low level activists of Islami Jamaiat e Tulba (IJT) – that is student wing of Jamaat-e-Islami – would lead you to discover that they are more involved in what Jamaat-e-Islami terms fahashi than rest of the infidel world outside the occupied premises of  government hostels.

(3) JI though is very much hyper about the Drone Attacks but it supports suicide bombings by Taliban and legitimize them by terming them as reaction. JI is also guilty of inciting violent mobs and rampaging public properties. JI is also guilty of destroying the beauty of people’s home and public spaces through wall chalking. I want to know where does Islam go during Wall Chalking? Whereas I have read myself the Fatwa of Imam Abu Yusuf who was most beloved pupil of Imam Abu Hanifa that Imam Abu Hanifa decreed that if a man takes even a pinch of silt from someone’s wall without his permission then he is guilty of terrible crime and must be dealt as a thief. So, Abu Yusuf said, Imam Abu Hanifa was used to walk carefully so that he wouldn’t touch walls of the houses in streets. Now where does Jamaat-e-Islami and Islami Jamiat-e-Tulba’s ISLAM goes when they do wall chalking and write hate slogans against countries and people on walls without the permission of owners? They are thieves according to Islam and their right hands should be fractured!

(4) Many off-shoots of Jamaat-e-Islami are involved in recruitment and fund raising for Taliban and extremists. Tehrik-e-Islami incident in Islamabad and arrest of TTP high ranking commander from Karachi University is no surprise or secret. 

(5) Islami Jamiat-e-Tulba is involved with the hefty business of selling cocaine and other drugs in universities. It is no surprise as many people who have lived in the Hostel of Punjab University and Quaid-e-Azam University know that IJT leaders are main drug paddlers of university.

(6) JI supports denial of justice to minorities and rape victims. A blasphemy law victim whose name was kept secret in the news item published in DAWN’s metropolitan page, was victimized on personal feud with Jamaat-e-Islami local leader. It is of no surprise what kind of threats JI leaders give to anyone who talks a bit sanity about the draconian laws such as Hudood or Blasphemy.

See and decide yourself!


2 thoughts on “Jamaat-e-Islami’s True Colors

  1. Sayed Shamsu Nazar Fatimi says:

    He argued that if a woman is raped and she doesn’t produce 4 male eye-witnesses of rape then either she should keep quiet or she should be prosecuted under the Shariah Law. He didn’t say what punishment she should be awarded. I assume that he was talking about stoning her to death just like what Zia ul Haq did when a poor blind rape victim failed to produce eye-witnesses of rape………..اگر یہ بات ہے تو شیطان نے زنا کیا یا کس نے ۔ ۔ اے عقل کے اندھو ۔ ۔ یہ ادارون کا کام ہے ۔ ۔ “لعلمہ الذین یستنبطونہ”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s